19 January 2009

I'm Going with "Snazzy Privy"

Animation World Network (AWN) has done it again! The site, which yearly features (in great layouts) all the nominees for both of the animated categories of the Academy Awards, is as of today featuring what appears to be this year's collective batch of animation nominees (reproduced below) - yes, this year's, in full three days' advance of the official nominees' announcement by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (AMPAS). I admit, until that official announcement, on the morning of Thursday, 22 January, we won't know for sure how fully accurate this list is; but, taking into account the preview from last year, I'd say they're fairly spot-on. The complete lists of these projected nominees for Animated Feature-Length and Animated Short films are here, reproduced below:

Animated Short
Glago's Guest, Disney
La Maison en Petits Cubes, Kunio Katö
Oktapodi
, Gobelins (Viewable Here)
Presto, Doug Sweetland (Viewable Here)
Skhizein, Jérémy Clapin

Animated Feature-Length

Kung Fu Panda
Wall•E
Waltz with Bashir

P. S. I've just discovered (via the Splog at Michael Sporn Animation, Inc.) that AWN can stand to be so accurately presumptuous about its projected nominees for the Animated Short Oscar category every year at this time, because every year at this time the long list of potential nominees is revised (
based on the votes of the preliminary screenings) and then rereleased to the voters, who be, as a short list of (from the initial 40) just 8 potential nominees. With just 8 options for the 5 nominees' slots, it's easy to see how they at AWN can seem so prescient to those of us who aren't in the voting know. To even the playing field, the 3 of the 8 that are not being listed by the folks at AWN are listed here:

Lavatory Lovestory, Konstantin Bronzit (Viewable Here)
This Way Up, Smith & Foulkes (Viewable as a Free Download via iTunes [until 25 January])
Varmints, Marc Craste



And how to predict the feature-length nominees is just by common sense.

16 January 2009

On Cinematography This Year

Inspired by Kristopher Tapley's "Top 10 Shots of 2008," an annual list composed by the In Contention blogger to give due praise to the ten extracted stills he found to be the best from films this year, (see Part One here and Part Two here), I have decided to post a bit about my favorite cinematographs (if you will honor the word) this year. While Kris' choices in my estimation hang on a bit more to showmanship than ability in my estimation, they nevertheless do point to some of the most talked-about images of the film year, images which I cannot deny belong too on my list as much as any of a similar sort. Specifically, these images of overlap, which I perhaps will call some of my most noteworthy cinematographs of 2008, are numbers 10, 8, 6, and 1 on his list: the stills captured in Milk, Revolutionary Road, The Wrestler, and Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One In) respectively. These images (and the others that I shall mention) find themselves in high estimation by me - even if perhaps, as in the cases of Milk, The Wrestler, and Revolutionary Road, I've found the context from which they were sprung overall to be unremarkable - because they were such images that, during my first-time seeing them upon the screen, made me sit back, exhale an "O," and think quietly to myself, "Yes, yes, that's very beautiful/quite right." The Revolutionary Road image itself (above) was compelling enough alone in the trailer, to make me (with even utter disregard for the entire rest of what was being previewed) extremely eagerly await the theatrical release of the film; and the image from Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One In; below) was so spectacular to the conclusion of the film that it seemed a paradigm of elegance in its depth and tranquil, steady capability. Why is that (elegance and capability), you ask, such an important consideration when composing a list like this one or - better yet - when judging the merit of the cinematography of a film? I answer, it is because the images in a film are intrinsically fluid, a shifting, gliding kaleidoscope of luminal change that nevertheless must cohere itself together and remain competent, if not commanding, in its audience-entrancing and -telling of the story, that elegance and capability, coherence and impact, are high-marked virtues of the great cinematograph - ones which I believe quite do outstand the other (common) shots from my and Mr. Tapley's lists from the field of their surroundings (and none quite as plainly as the image from Milk, which merits a place here exactly for its transparency despite the fact that others may prefer to call it on the side of heavy-handedness). What of your considerations for cinematography then, you continue; which of them, or why do they, merit a spot on your list? Well, to begin with, I would add to my list at least one further image from Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One In), at least one of the three: the split image of Håkan, Eli's care-taker, on left, waiting with the certain knowledge of his discovery and later arrest for murder and attempted murder, and the boys, one of whom was Håkan's intended victim, on right, untying their bound comrade; the half-frenzied image of Virginia, being driven from Gösta's apartment by siege of his ~12 cats, while he himself and another watch her from outside, on his balcony; and the subsequent image of Virginia, now hospitalized for her condition, bursting into a ball of fire once daylight has streamed in from the open window she had requested - all incredibly compelling stills. I would also include on my list stills from other films that made Mr. Tapley's list: an image from Slumdog Millionaire, one from the opening scenes, during which the heavy dyes of India ink out in hazy puffs and swashes as the fast-paced cuts paint the vibrant but troubled landscape; an image from The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (above), from Daisy's ballet career, when she extends for him in dance in the backlight of an old stage; and an image from The Dark Knight, when The Joker, hunched, waits with anticipatory glee against the depthless black backdrop of the city for Batman to charge at him on his motorcycle. And, finally, because I like to make lists in elevens and threes, I would add three of my own selections to this list of most noteworthy cinematographs from films of this year: from Wall•E a still (above) from the opening sequences, in which the barren expanse of the decay of man and machine is laid waste over Wall•E's daily world, the shot which I so analogously called the "elephant graveyard" of this film; from Doubt the couplet of bookending stills that in their two frames outline the entire film (a couplet about which I spoke highly in my review of the film, here); and - slightly for fun - from Kung Fu Panda the (above) still of sage Oogway, passing on and washing away into a flurry of lavender petals that crystallize as stars in the blue night sky, an image that like so much of the imagery of that film smartly lies at the intersection of the old and the new Japan. Because each of these 11 images, from Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One In) to Kung Fu Panda, captures in a single frame not only the essence of its parent film but also the poignancy of it, I believe, these 11 represent the most noteworthy filmic images of the year, cinematographs that for those readers who would prefer a tidy ordered list I've repeated, ranked, here, after the jump:

  1. Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One In; shown)
  2. Revolutionary Road
  3. Slumdog Millionaire
  4. Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One In; not shown)
  5. The Dark Knight
  6. The Wrestler
  7. Doubt
  8. Milk
  9. Wall•E
  10. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
  11. Kung Fu Panda

14 January 2009

Announcement: The Shorts

Via Awards Daily, it pleases me greatly to let you know that the short films to be nominated for the Academy's related categories will be in February released throughout the entire country theatrically, that the public may get a sporting chance to see them prior to the televised ceremony in which their winners are awarded their respective statuettes. As the brief on Awards Daily notes, the shorts have achieved an increasingly high level of respect and interest among the public in the past few years, a level which has now (thankfully) allowed them to receive distribution beyond the historically limited, one theater in Los Angeles. The release, which specifically will begin on 6 February, will touch 60 cities and, for those living without the reach of those cities, the global delivery service iTunes (two weeks later, on the 22nd).
For me, the release in iTunes, I think, is a particularly good idea, because of its reach; and I was perplexed when it, which had begun (to my knowledge) in anticipation of the awards two years ago, was without a word discontinued last year dismayingly. I'm definitely glad of that it's back now, with the theatrical release to boot! - a service that will no doubt chop off the leg up Pixar has traditionally, until now, had for benefit of its coupled releasings, like last year's Lifted and Ratatouille and this year's Presto and Wall•E. While Presto will undoubtedly be among the five nominees in the Animated Short category this year, as it would be a rare miss for Pixar, which is historically founded upon the integrity of its shorts, to not make it among the five, the rest of the still to be announced nominees now may shift around their often consummate-with-Pixar's skills in the new popular reception.
Speaking of the animated nominees, Animation World Network (AWN), my go-to site for news and views and even previews of the nominees (see last year's preview for the relevant notes, here), has already established its preliminary site for the 2009 Oscar showcase, the tradition of which it has been carrying on since four years before the feature-length animated films began receiving their individual Academic due, in 1998. While such preliminary readyings have not yet betrayed what or which of the many noteworthy animated shorts from around the world may receive such similar recognition in the Animated Short category, the site will no doubt feature such news soon, news of which I dutifully will keep you posted up, whenever it break. :)
Until then, if you haven't already, have a look at some speculated leading contenders: Presto on YouTube, here; (a clip of) Hot Dog (by Bill Plympton), here; and, a quick favorite, the magnetizing Sebastian's Voodoo (by Joaquin Baldwin), here.

13 January 2009

Addendum to Coincidence: On Kate

It seems like I wasn't the first to publish a post on the magnificent Kate post her double-Globes win on Sunday (though arguably the first to publish one on that Extras tie-in); bloggers all over the blogosphere have been plugging away at contributing to the great actress, perhaps on the cusp of history (should she in fact be nominated for both categories and - dare I say it, lest I jinx it - win both at the Oscars). Here, below, are two of my favorite of those other posts, the former a sort of paean to her striking repertoire, containing clips not only from her Extras work (for which it may be here worth noting that she was nominated for an Emmy [i. e., "Guest Actress in a Comedy Series," 2006] that she in what was until then true Kate--awards'-ceremony fashion ultimately lost [to Oscar-winner Cloris Leachman, who won for her great work playing Ida in Malcolm in the Middle]) but also from her filmic and Oscar-nominated work (the highlight of which is certainly her work in 2004's brilliant Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind - work for which Hilary Swank robbed her the statuette); the latter a more modest consideration of her work from the Times.

Coincidence: On Kate

So, I'd been hoping to save any recollection of this hilarious episode of the now ended HBO series Extras for if and after Kate should win the Oscar for either of her two award-winning performances this year, performances which - let's not anyone be hasty - she has even yet to be nominated for (as the Oscar nominations don't officially come out, despite rampant suspicions and expectations, until the 22nd of this month); but, seeing as Ricky Gervais, star and title character of Extras, found it appropriate to jump the gun (and misquote himself) and announce the coincidence on live television this past Sunday night at the Golden Globe Awards' ceremony (from which Kate went home with both statuettes-accolades in a widely unsuspected, unexpected coincidence itself), who am I to deny hilarity in foreshadowing to the masses? Below, please, witness the Extras clip to which I refer (and in which Kate plays an appropriately cynical and potentially Oscar-crazy parody of herself on spot [a parody that may well apply to the real-life personages of several other high-caliber yet still 'officially unrecognized' actresses out there]). (Hint: [From HBO] "Holocaust=Oscar.") Enjoy!

The clip (from the pilot episode of Extras; see specifically time ~3:40 for the relevant bit):

12 January 2009

Recapitulation: The Golden Globes

So, the Golden Globe Awards, the annual Hollywood ceremony in which Hollywood outsiders who have borne more than their fair shares of negative scrutiny (see here) attempt to applaud the best in film of the year but usually succeed in only making a lot of fuss for stylists and make-up artists, were last night; and, though I can't say that I'm not happy that Kate has finally received some formal recognition for her abilities and contributions - however suspect the recognizing body may be - I have to say that not much else stuck with me from the ceremony. If I were to say anything more, I'd address the sincerely-delivered, but here comically-received, over-the-top accommendations delivered to Steven Spielberg upon his reception of the Globes' egregious Cecil B. DeMille award, accomendations thoroughly reiterated (with appropriate commentary) via GreenCine Daily, here:

Steven Spielberg. Humility is not an essential trait, but the 62-year-old blockbusterian came off unexpectedly pompous during his acceptance speech for the Cecil B. DeMille lifetime achievement award. In recalling the story of how DeMille's The Greatest Show on Earth inspired his desire to recreate and film the climactic train crash with his own model set (and thus, launching his love for moviemaking), he said: "I think what was on my mind when I was risking losing my Lionel train set was me thinking, 'Am I going to get away with this?' That anxiety has been haunting me throughout my entire movie career. Whenever I've tried to tell a risky story, whether it's about sharks or dinosaurs or about aliens or about history, I'll always be thinking, 'Am I going to get away with this?'" My question is, and I say this having admired and enjoyed plenty of his output (A.I., Jaws, Duel, Raiders of the Lost Ark), could Spielberg really be called a risky storyteller? As a sensational craftsman alone he deserves the DeMille honor, but has Hollywood's most sacred cow really been "inventing and reinventing cinema with each new picture" as his peer and pal Martin Scorsese claims he has for 40 years? Perhaps it's a silly question on a night of hyperbolic back-patting.

10 January 2009

Review: The Reader

Genre: Drama (Historical Fiction)

So, I saw this film last weekend but have neglected write a review of it here, on A Year in Film, until now, partly because I just haven't gotten 'round to it until now but mostly because it is a bit of difficult film to judge. On one hand (i. e., the hand of filmmaking, of tight storylines, and of resolved plot points), the film seems a mess, a surefire rocket to mediocrity and other bottom-of-the-barrel, movie-reviewing politics for its lack of clear coherence, its lack of polished argument, and the overall incompleteness that shapes its every part; yet, on the other hand
(i. e., the hand of impact, of acting mettle, and of social bravery), the film is a success, a purposeful sting in the eye of films that attempt at bringing by the arrogance of their mediocre two hours closure and closedness to, not only the emotional stories of "people's" lives, but also the deeply scarring, human tragedy that was the (capital H) Holocaust. For the film does eschew any sense of the traditional (shapely) arc that conforms most stories, one that does not necessarily have a solid beginning, middle, and end but rather has a dynamism, a shift, a change of character or tenor or mood in a way that is undeniably wrought by the actions of the plot, a way that often is to the end of making a point about society or us, its people; the film instead takes instances, vignettes almost from the life of its main character, the curious-turned-reclusive Michael Berg, vignettes that are not enough to form a clear idea of his person or the true person of anyone who touches his life - not even the woman whose actions motivate the grounds of most of the action shown, Ms. Winslet's sharp but daft Hanna Schmitz - and turns those vignettes into a loosely woven portraiture or "situation tale" of how the people that enter into one's life, regardless of the nature of the impact they make, never vacate the concavities of their impressions onto one, but instead remain, ported forever by one's own memory into the stretches of time beyond even their own. Mr. Berg, Hanna Schmitz, and the daughter (played by Lena Olin), who with her mother cowrote a survivors' memoir about the time the two had spent under Nazi guard Schmitz, each bear stories that resonate with this point; and it is from such stories that the film reaches its poignancy. It seems to say by them that, like a book whose words are the indelible traces upon the shape of the cultural landscape by its author, so too is this film itself, a collective record of such stories, a trace of lives and their interwoven subcomplexities upon the shape of the landscape - your landscape, the viewer's.
However, perhaps I should emend that last statement, for the fact that is is less that the film "seems to say by [its stories]" what I have written than that the film seems to try to say such by them - only to try and, like the dissociated structure of its narrative, fall short of that ambition, which undoubtedly (to me) is its point. The dissociated structure that I've already in short detail discussed fails to leave enough for us, the viewers, to latch onto, enough for us by which to navigate its argumentative course and grab hold of each subpoint as monkey-bars on the way to the grand, over-arching reason (laid out in plain language above). In perhaps fearing to tread too deeply into the wounds and actualities of the Holocaust itself and similarly refusing to enter too deeply into a morality-v.-legality debate about the (de)meritorious nature of that occurrence's actions - moves that may have very well been deliberate to maintain a stronger focus on the (above) point of the work - the film by unfortunate result but skims the surface globally on issues all, issues which in tidier juxtapositions could have lobbied a stronger, more closely bonded case for the effects of memory. As it is now, the details that there are to link together the necessary marks in the constellation of the main point are too individual, too esoteric, and too subtle to achieve their conjunct success; and viewers with eyes, ears, and minds not as privy or acute to them as the filmmakers and the screenwriter himself - viewers who are by such criteria exceedingly likely to be the noble majority - must glance over them without even the quivering beginnings of second thoughts. ("Unlock the Mystery," indeed.)
To say that the tone and the level of acting in The Reader (i. e., tranquil, serious, understated) were at all inappropriate is a fallacy, but to say that their impact created a great film is, too, inaccurate. That The Reader was on the right track is undeniable, but that it actually got there, where it wanted and needed and should have ultimately come to be, is impossible, I, a viewer, am both careful and confident to say.

Grade: B/B-.

08 January 2009

Broadcast: The Critics' Choice Awards

The 14th Annual Critics' Choice Awards will be broadcast live tonight, starting at 9pm on VH1. An awards' pre-show, featuring all the rote introductions to the nominees, glamor gab, and vapid hosts one can expect, begins one half-hour before, at 8:30pm.

For a reminder list of the nominees, see below:

BEST PICTURE
Changeling
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Dark Knight
Doubt
Frost/Nixon
Milk
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire
Wall•E
The Wrestler

MORE

BEST ACTOR
Clint Eastwood - Gran Torino
Richard Jenkins - The Visitor
Frank Langella - Frost/Nixon
Sean Penn - Milk
Brad Pitt - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Mickey Rourke - The Wrestler

BEST ACTRESS

Kate Beckinsale - Nothing but the Truth
Cate Blanchett - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Anne Hathaway - Rachel Getting Married
Angelina Jolie - Changeling
Melissa Leo - Frozen River
Meryl Streep - Doubt

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Josh Brolin - Milk
Robert Downey, Jr. - Tropic Thunder
Philip Seymour Hoffman - Doubt
Heath Ledger - The Dark Knight
James Franco - Milk

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Penelope Cruz - Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Viola Davis - Doubt
Vera Farmiga - Nothing but the Truth
Taraji P. Henson - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Marisa Tomei - The Wrestler
Kate Winslet - The Reader

BEST ACTING ENSEMBLE
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Dark Knight
Doubt
Milk
Rachel Getting Married

BEST DIRECTOR
Danny Boyle - Slumdog Millionaire
David Fincher - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Ron Howard - Frost/Nixon
Christopher Nolan - The Dark Knight
Gus van Sant - Milk

BEST WRITER
Simon Beaufoy - Slumdog Millionaire
Dustin Lance Black - Milk
Peter Morgan - Frost/Nixon
Eric Roth - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
John Patrick Shanley - Doubt

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE
Bolt
Kung Fu Panda
Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa
Wall•E
Waltz with Bashir

BEST YOUNG ACTOR/ACTRESS
Dakota Fanning - The Secret Life of Bees
David Kross - The Reader
Dev Patel - Slumdog Millionaire
Brandon Walters - Australia

BEST ACTION MOVIE
The Dark Knight
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Iron Man
Quantum of Solace
Wanted

BEST COMEDY MOVIE
Burn After Reading
Forgetting Sarah Marshall
Role Models
Tropic Thunder
Vicky Cristina Barcelona

BEST PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION
John Adams
Recount
Coco Chanel

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
Un Conte de Noël
Gomorrah
Il Y A Longtemps Que Je T'Aime
Låt der Rätte Komma In
Mongol
Waltz with Bashir

BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
I.O.U.S.A.
Man on a Wire
Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
Standard Operating Procedure
Young at Heart

BEST SONG
“Another Way to Die” (performed by Jack White and Alicia Keys, written by Jack White) - Quantum of Solace
“Down to Earth” (performed by Peter Gabriel, written by Peter Gabriel and Thomas Newman) - Wall•E
“I Thought I Lost You” (performed Miley Cyrus and John Travolta, written by Miley Cyrus and Jeffrey Steele) - Bolt
“Jai Ho” (performed by Sukhwinder Singh, written by A.R. Rahman and Gulzar) - Slumdog Millionaire
“The Wrestler” (performed by Bruce Springsteen, written by Bruce Springsteen) - The Wrestler

BEST COMPOSER
Alexandre Desplat - The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Clint Eastwood - Changeling
Danny Elfman - Milk
Hans Zimmer/James Newton Howard - The Dark Knight
A.R. Rahman - Slumdog Millionaire

06 January 2009

Announcement: Finalized Short Lists of Make-Up and Visual Effects Nominees by the Academy

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (AMPAS) has released its short lists of nominees for its make-up and visual effects categories, to be finalized into the actual nominees on the 22nd. While for the most part the films were to be expected from the Academy, the inclusion of The Reader in the make-up list is a curious one, as AMPAS doesn't usually appreciate subtlety or narrowness of use. Though it's likely to be eliminated come the official nominees' announcement, it's interesting to see it here now. In any case, below are the short lists for each of the two categories:

Make-Up
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Dark Knight
Hellboy II: The Golden Army
The Reader
Synecdoche, New York
Tropic Thunder
The Wrestler

Visual Effects
Australia
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Dark Knight
Hellboy II: The Golden Army
Iron Man
Journey to the Center of the Earth
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

04 January 2009

(Re)Design: Oscars.org

Oscars.org, the Academy's ontological website, has just recently been given a redesign, apparently in attempts to make the site more expansive, more user-friendly, and generally prettier. I'll say it: Mission accomplished. Check it out here; the photographic slideshows are particularly interesting.

P. S. As a small reminder: The Academy is scheduled to release its list of nominees for this year's awards live on Thursday, 22 January, to be followed by the televised awards-ceremony one month later, 22 February. (I will be presenting my finalized lists of nominees and winners by those respective dates.)